In Ontario, equalization refers to property (assets and debts) division for married spouses only. This does not apply to common-law couples (i.e., couples who cohabit but do not marry).
Generally, for each spouse, the following calculation is completed:
(a) add up all of the assets that the spouse owned on the date the parties separated
(also known as the "valuation date");
(b) subtract all of the debts that the spouse had on the date of separation from the
value in (a) above to obtain that spouse's net worth on the date of separation; then
(c) subtract the net worth (assets less debts) that the spouse had on the date of
marriage.
The result of this mathematical exercise equals a spouse's net family property (NFP). NFP refers to the increase in net worth that a spouse has obtained during the marriage. The spouse with the highest NFP pays the other one-half the difference between the parties' NFPs. Confused yet? An example may help:
Let's say the Husband had the following assets and debts
a) on the date of separation:
Matrimonial Home - 50% owned with wife: $150,000.00
Car: $10,000.00
Bank Account: $5,000.00
Investments: $5,000.00
Employment Pension: $100,000.00
Mortgage on Matrimonial Home ($75,000.00)
Credit Card ($5,000.00)
= net worth on date of separation: $190,000.00
b) on date of marriage:
Car: $15,000.00
Bank Account: $2,000.00
Pension: $50,000.00
Credit Card: ($10,000.00)
= net worth on the date of marriage: $57,000.00
c) Husband's NFP = $190,000 less $57,000.00 = $133,000.00.
Let's say we did the same calculation for the wife (using different numbers) and the wife's
NFP was $75,000.00.
The difference in NFPs would be $133,000.00 less $75,000.00 = $58,000.00 half of which
is $29,000.00. That means that the Husband would owe the wife an equalization
payment of $29,000.00 and since the matrimonial home is jointly owned each party is
entitled to half the equity in the home as well. The parties would keep all of their
other property that is in their sole names and their own sole debts.
This is a simple example, but equalization can get quite complicated as there are laws relating to the matrimonial home owned on the date of marriage, excluded property, valuations, whether there should be an unequal division of NFPs and many more. Spouses should retain lawyers to assist them with the equalization calculation and applicable laws associated with same.
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Thursday, 16 November 2017
Equalization - What is It and How is It Calculated?
Labels:
court,
debts,
divorce,
equalization,
marriage,
net family property,
property,
separation,
separation agreement
Location:
Barrie, ON, Canada
Monday, 30 October 2017
Why You Should Hire a Lawyer: The Dangers of "Do It Yourself Family Law."
Many individuals choose to represent themselves in a separation or divorce. Some examples are as follows:
1. A party representing himself/herself in Family Court;
2. Both parties unrepresented and draft a Separation Agreement amongst themselves;
3. One party represented by a lawyer and the other party not obtaining Independent
Legal Advice before signing a Separation Agreement.
Legal Advice before signing a Separation Agreement.
There are dangers in all of these options as follows:
1. Self-Representation in Court - you are more likely to obtain a positive resolution if
you hire a lawyer to represent you in Court or at least to coach you through the process
you hire a lawyer to represent you in Court or at least to coach you through the process
(discussed below under Limited Scope Retainers). If one party is represented by a
lawyer and the other is not, then the self-represented party is at a significant
disadvantage in the case. From not knowing the law, not knowing the rules of Family
Court, to not knowing how to properly fill out court paperwork the self-represented party is
taking a risk in not hiring a lawyer to guide him/her through the process.
lawyer and the other is not, then the self-represented party is at a significant
disadvantage in the case. From not knowing the law, not knowing the rules of Family
Court, to not knowing how to properly fill out court paperwork the self-represented party is
taking a risk in not hiring a lawyer to guide him/her through the process.
2. Self-Preparation of Separation Agreements - There are three significant risks of signing
a home-made separation agreement:
a) The Agreement may be found unenforceable for a variety of reasons, such as
missing essential terms, not having independent legal advice, not having proper
financial disclosure exchanged, or having unclear/conflicting terms.
b) A party may be agreeing to something that he or she does not intend. If the parties
use a "precedent" separation agreement either from the internet or from someone
else that hired a lawyer to do their Agreement, the parties may include clauses from
these precedents that do not apply to their specific case or that the parties do
not understand the consequences of.
c) A party may not have included a term/terms that should be included such as proper
releases, review clauses, termination clauses, etc.
3. Not obtaining Independent Legal Advice - if one party does not obtain independent
legal advice (ILA), that party may not thoroughly understand what he or she is signing or
the consequences of it. For the party that has a lawyer, the risk if the other party does not
have ILA is that the Separation Agreement could be set aside for that very reason as the
non-represented party could allege that he or she did not understand what they were
signing or that they did not have the capacity to sign.
Family Law is a complex area of law that is changing every day and has significant consequences for the daily life of the person involved (i.e., impacts their daily finances, how much time they see with their children, etc.). All of the risks mentioned above can result in increased legal costs for the individual to hire a lawyer to try to fix what was done the first time when the individual was self-represented. By hiring a lawyer to represent you in your separation or divorce you can save thousands of dollars in future legal costs.
Not everyone can afford a lawyer to fully represent them. An alternative to hiring a lawyer for full representation is called a Limited Scope Retainer. A Limited Scope Retainer is a client hiring a lawyer for a limited purpose of their case. Examples include:
1. Litigation Coach - the individual is self-represented, but hires a lawyer to coach them in
the background, give an opinion on a specific legal issue, represent them only on a
specific legal issue, represent them only for a specific step in the process, help the
individual draft their court paperwork or provide ILA on a proposed resolution.
2. Provide ILA and draft a Separation Agreement in which the parties have agreed upon
terms amongst themselves - the parties have saved money on the negotiation part of
their case, but hire lawyers to ensure that the Agreement is legally binding, clear and
sets out what they agreed to. Further, the lawyers will ensure that their clients
understand what they are signing, have capacity to sign, and understand the
consequences of the Agreement.
At Chapman McAlpine Law, we offer both full representation and limited scope representation. Whatever process you chose, we strive to offer family law services in an approachable, friendly and compassionate environment, while providing reasonable costs and exceptional service. Contact us today to book a one hour no-obligation consultation: 705-302-3696 or info@chapmanmcalpine.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)